Milestones and Pitfalls
Weekly column written for the Singapore Unbound newsletter. Sign up here.
A milestone: my private school on the Upper East Side of NYC has
gone for 6 teaching weeks without having to close because of the virus.
Sure, some groups of students had had to stay home because a classmate
or two had a household member who tested or could be positive, but the
rest of the school had continued to function, and after the requisite
weeks of quarantine, those students had rejoined in-person learning. As a
teacher, I can't begin to tell you the immense difference between real
and virtual learning. An informal poll will have to suffice. All my
juniors, 16-17 years old, said that they would rather study in school
than at home.
It is only possible for my school to reach such a milestone because we
have such superior resources. We are rich not only in funding but also
in personnel. Our teacher-to-student ratio is small. More importantly,
our staff-to-student ratio is also small, much better than that in
public schools. With many more staff, we can plan ahead and deal with
contingencies more thoughtfully, we can nurse more personally, we can
feed everyone more nutritiously, we can provide tech support more
handily, we can clean the school more thoroughly, and we can communicate
more effectively all that we are doing.
Public schools in the poorer school districts cannot do what we do. Not
necessarily because their faculty or staff or students are inferior in
quality, but primarily because they lack the resources necessary to open
schools and stay open. This is a shame on the country. When politicians
called for schools to reopen in September but refused to provide them
with the resources to do so safely, they were guilty of endangering many
lives. The pandemic has surfaced many forms of inequity in our
societies, but arguably the most pernicious form has been in our
schools, if we still consider the young to be our common future. While
my students are zooming along in their learning, others are still trying
to deal with Zoom, if they have Zoom at all.
This November, we must consider the educational platforms of election
candidates at all levels, from the Presidency down to the town council.
More important than student testing, teacher training, and school
vouchers is the question of funding. Who among the candidates stands for
a more equitable distribution of resources to schools? Who will not
just level the playing field, but fill the pits in the field, impossible
for schools and students to climb out of without a strong helping hand?
Jee Leong Koh
October 22, 2020
Comments